<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iMac with 24&#8243; Screen Desktop Computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alertdeals.com/apple-imac-with-desktop-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alertdeals.com/apple-imac-with-desktop-computer/</link>
	<description>Find the best deals on the web!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10dulkar</title>
		<link>http://www.alertdeals.com/apple-imac-with-desktop-computer/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>10dulkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alertdeals.com/?p=1201#comment-163</guid>
		<description>am very tempted to buy one for my wife - have never bought a mac before. would this be a 'sufficiently' decent config for itunes/pictures/watching hd video/net surfing? most importantly, how does this compare to the new imacs which are about $175 more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am very tempted to buy one for my wife - have never bought a mac before. would this be a &#8217;sufficiently&#8217; decent config for itunes/pictures/watching hd video/net surfing? most importantly, how does this compare to the new imacs which are about $175 more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
